<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Federal Protections for Healthcare Workers Opposed to Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://medheadlines.com/2008/08/25/new-federal-protections-for-healthcare-workers-opposed-to-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://medheadlines.com/2008/08/25/new-federal-protections-for-healthcare-workers-opposed-to-abortion/</link>
	<description>Medical news updated 24 hours</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Franklee</title>
		<link>http://medheadlines.com/2008/08/25/new-federal-protections-for-healthcare-workers-opposed-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-9433</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medheadlines.com/?p=1315#comment-9433</guid>
		<description>So: You People say that you have a right to an abortion, and it's not our business. Fine, I can go along with that, even if I disagree with abortions as a method of birth control. However, WE do not have the right to refuse to perform an abortion, because of moral, religious or whatever reasons? That's absolute hypocrisy, though I'm sure that some "enlightened" folks will have other names for it.

Franklee
Ex-Republican for Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So: You People say that you have a right to an abortion, and it&#8217;s not our business. Fine, I can go along with that, even if I disagree with abortions as a method of birth control. However, WE do not have the right to refuse to perform an abortion, because of moral, religious or whatever reasons? That&#8217;s absolute hypocrisy, though I&#8217;m sure that some &#8220;enlightened&#8221; folks will have other names for it.</p>
<p>Franklee<br />
Ex-Republican for Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://medheadlines.com/2008/08/25/new-federal-protections-for-healthcare-workers-opposed-to-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-9432</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://medheadlines.com/?p=1315#comment-9432</guid>
		<description>So people can opt out of performing part of their job description based on religious or personal beliefs.  BUT an employer cannot ask an applicant for a position about their personal beliefs (one of the 7 protected classes).  This is going to cause many problems.  Will an employer be able to fire someone for not performing their job if it coincides with this law?  If not I see a ton of Pro-life nurses and front office personnel applying for jobs at abortion clinics and refusing to do their job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So people can opt out of performing part of their job description based on religious or personal beliefs.  BUT an employer cannot ask an applicant for a position about their personal beliefs (one of the 7 protected classes).  This is going to cause many problems.  Will an employer be able to fire someone for not performing their job if it coincides with this law?  If not I see a ton of Pro-life nurses and front office personnel applying for jobs at abortion clinics and refusing to do their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
