July 8, 2008 – 4:24 pm | One Comment

In a move sure to stir controversy, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended on Monday that a more aggressive approach to treating high cholesterol in children should be implemented, even if it means prescribing …

Read the full story »
Diet

Drugs

Lifestyle

Medical Research

Prevention

Home » Drugs, Ethics, Lifestyle, Women's Health

Pro-Life Drugstores

Submitted by MedHeadlines on June 19, 2008 – 4:49 am6 Comments
 

America’s pharmacists are facing an ever-expanding pharmacopeia from which to dispense the medications that ease pain, cure infection, and help people everywhere maintain a standard of living unsurpassed by previous generations.  Some of the drugs in that mind-boggling array of medications are cause for much concern among a growing number of pharmacists who do not feel religiously or morally comfortable dispensing birth control prescription drugs, condoms, and contraceptives.  More and more of them are opting out of the traditional drugstore setting and they’re developing their own “pro-life” drugstores, where contraceptives in any form are, quite simply, not in stock.

Pro-Life PharmaciesIn recent years, some pharmacists have refused to fill prescriptions for birth control and morning-after pills, calling it their right of conscience to refuse to do work that conflicts with their personal beliefs.  The growing practice of refusing to fill certain prescriptions has generated heated controversy, legislative changes, and even legal action against some of these pharmacists.

Many pro-life pharmacy owners carry no items that aid contraception and some have gone even further, refusing to stock pornography, rolling papers, and tobacco products.  As an added service, they frequently include nutritional supplements, herbal and homeopathic remedies, and custom compounding of prescription drugs as routine parts of their business.

Pro-life pharmacies stir controversy among women’s rights advocates who fear these pharmacies will limit a woman’s access to life-changing medications while maintaining a full arsenal of drugs for men, including Viagra, prescribed for sexual dysfunction.  The concern is especially strong when a rape victim must take the Plan B morning-after pill as soon after attack as possible to circumvent any pregnancy that might have resulted in the assault.

Others are concerned that limiting the products offered may infringe on licensing requirements meted out by each state to its pharmaceutical industry.  To address this issue, legislative changes in a growing number of states require all pharmacies to fill all prescriptions in every case.

A spokesperson for one bioethics think tank said a pharmacist needs to be a pharmacist all the time, not just when he or she approves of medical protocol as sanctioned by the medical establishment, prescribing physicians, and governing bodies.

Another bioethicist has voiced the concern that selectively limiting services to an entire class of individuals discriminates against women and has the potential to become quite problematic in areas served by only pro-life pharmacies, such as in rural settings where choices are limited.

Source: Washington Post

6 Comments »

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.