July 8, 2008 – 4:24 pm | One Comment

In a move sure to stir controversy, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended on Monday that a more aggressive approach to treating high cholesterol in children should be implemented, even if it means prescribing …

Read the full story »
Diet

Drugs

Lifestyle

Medical Research

Prevention

Home » Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Drugs, Lifestyle, Prevention, Sexuality, Vaccinations, Women's Health

Women Given GARDASIL Have Fewer Abnormal Pap Smears

Submitted by admin on March 10, 2008 – 5:15 pm3 Comments
 

A new study shows that the HPV vaccine, GARDASIL, reduced abnormal Pap test results by 43 percent compared to women not given the vaccine. GARDASIL is FDA approved against the human papilloma virus (HPV) strains (6, 11, 16, 18) believed to cause 70 percent of cervical cancers and more than 90 percent of genital warts.
more benefits of GARDASILNearly 25 million U.S. women between the ages of 14 and 59 are infected with HPV, and the annual cost of screening and treating cervical abnormalities is about $4 billion, according to a statement from the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists.
Study results have been derived from three separate trials of over 18,000 women, between the ages 16 and 26, in the United States, Europe and Asia. All participants had normal Pap smear readings at the beginning of the study.
In addition to the drop in unwanted Pap results, the study found invasive procedures like cervical biopsies were performed up to 42 percent less in GARDASIL recipients compared to women not given the vaccine.
“Clearly the vaccine’s benefits include something that can be appreciated by women and daughters fairly quickly,” said Warner Huh, M.D., associate professor in the UAB Division of Gynecologic Oncology. “This is a positive first sign, and it will take many more years to know definitively if the vaccine prevents cancer.”

Note: Dr. Huh is a consultant for Merck & Co, Inc, the makers of GARDASIL

Source: University of Alabama at Birmingham

opinion

  • Has GARDASIL been evaluated long enough to determine it’s benefits, or will it take many more years to find out if it is indeed effective?


3 Comments »

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.